Where defendants attempt to abscond or exit jurisdictional limits, what orders may courts issue for self-satisfaction_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. To furnish security
Explanation
Courts may order defendants to furnish security if they attempt to abscond from jurisdiction. Securing financial or personal guarantees prevents defendants from frustrating potential court decrees. Judicial self-satisfaction regarding flight risks justifies issuing preventive security orders. Civil procedure empowers courts to arrest or demand security from defendants fleeing jurisdiction. Furnishing security ensures that successful plaintiffs can recover awarded damages later. Judges must evaluate credible evidence indicating an imminent attempt to abscond.
Commercial fraudsters often try to flee the country before civil courts issue final judgments. Requiring security protects plaintiffs from suffering uncollectible financial court awards. It balances the defendant's freedom of movement with the plaintiff's right to execution. Surrendering for arrest is a severe measure secondary to furnishing financial security. Compelling a compromise with the plaintiff exceeds the court's power regarding absconders. None of these is wrong since ordering security is the standard judicial safeguard.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. Which military officers possess the authority to disperse unlawful assemblies_____________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Any Commissioned Officer
Any Commissioned Officer of the armed forces possesses statutory authority to disperse unlawful assemblies when civil power fails. Criminal procedure statutes permit military intervention to restore public order under ex...
Q2. Which C.P.C Order governs appeals originating from appellate decrees______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Order XLII
Order XLII of the civil procedure code specifically regulates appeals arising from appellate decrees. Subordinate court appellate decisions are challenged using the framework provided within this order. The rules streaml...
Q3. Individuals bound by oath to tell the truth who make false statements face punishment of________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Imprisonment for seven years
Individuals bound by oath who make false statements face imprisonment for seven years. Severe penalties deter witnesses from committing perjury during official judicial proceedings. Imposing a seven-year prison term unde...
Q4. Inflicting pain, disease, harm, or impairing/dismembering any bodily organ without causing death is designated as______________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Cause hurt
Inflicting pain, disease, harm, or impairing any bodily organ without causing death is defined as causing hurt. Penal code definitions classify all non-lethal physical injuries and impairments under the broad legal headi...
Q5. Causing a wound leaving permanent or temporary marks on bodily parts other than the head or face is classified as ____________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Jurh
Jurh classifies wounds that leave permanent or temporary marks on bodily parts excluding the head. Islamic criminal jurisprudence categorizes physical injuries based on location and severity of the harm. Distinguishing j...
Q6. Cheating by impersonation, substituting individuals knowingly, or misrepresenting identities constitutes an offense punishable by _______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Called cheating by personation
Cheating by impersonation or misrepresenting identities is legally called cheating by personation. This specific offense occurs when someone pretends to be another person during transactions. Legal definitions distinguis...