Cheating by impersonation, substituting individuals knowingly, or misrepresenting identities constitutes an offense punishable by _______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Called cheating by personation
Explanation
Cheating by impersonation or misrepresenting identities is legally called cheating by personation. This specific offense occurs when someone pretends to be another person during transactions. Legal definitions distinguish personation from general fraud to ensure precise criminal charges. Penal codes criminalize fraudulent identity substitution to protect commercial and legal trust. Cheating by personation requires proof that the accused knowingly assumed a false identity. Offenders face significant prison sentences for deceiving victims through identity misrepresentation.
Identity theft and exam impersonation cases are prosecuted under these specific legal provisions. Financial institutions implement strict verification protocols to prevent cheating by personation. Criminal prosecutors rely on documentary evidence to prove fraudulent identity substitution in court. Option B suggests general cheating, which lacks the specific identity substitution element. Option C points to broad fraud, overlooking the precise statutory title of the offense. Option D is incorrect because cheating by personation is the exact legal term defined.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. Where defendants attempt to abscond or exit jurisdictional limits, what orders may courts issue for self-satisfaction_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. To furnish security
Courts may order defendants to furnish security if they attempt to abscond from jurisdiction. Securing financial or personal guarantees prevents defendants from frustrating potential court decrees. Judicial self-satisfac...
Q2. Causing the itlaf of any tooth other than a milk tooth incurs liability for_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. One-twentieth of diyat
The correct answer applies because Islamic penal jurisprudence sets specific financial compensations for causing bodily harm to teeth. Permanent teeth carry a higher financial compensation value under diyat rules compare...
Q3. Inflicting pain, disease, harm, or impairing/dismembering any bodily organ without causing death is designated as______________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Cause hurt
Inflicting pain, disease, harm, or impairing any bodily organ without causing death is defined as causing hurt. Penal code definitions classify all non-lethal physical injuries and impairments under the broad legal headi...
Q4. Criminal breach of trust is punishable with a term of imprisonment lasting ____________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Seven years as provided in section 406 P.P.C.
Section 406 of the Pakistan Penal Code prescribes imprisonment up to seven years for breach of trust. Criminal breach of trust involves dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to an offender. The severity of the...
Q5. Extortion is punishable under section 384 of the P.P.C with imprisonment of either description extending up to ____________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Three years
The correct answer applies because Section 384 prescribes a maximum prison term of three years for the offense of extortion. The legislative framework sets a proportionate penalty for unlawfully inducing fear of injury t...
Q6. Perpetrators of isqat-i-haml are liable to tazir punishments involving imprisonment of either description for________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both (a) and (b)
Perpetrators of isqat-i-haml face tazir punishments varying based on whether the act was done with or without consent. Penal provisions distinguish between consensual and non-consensual termination of pregnancy when assi...