The 18th amendment curtailed the President's authority to dissolve the National Assembly under Article __________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. 58(2)(b)
Explanation
The Eighteenth Amendment omitted Article 58(2)(b), thereby stripping the President of the discretionary power to dissolve the National Assembly. Legislative intent focused on strengthening parliamentary democracy by removing executive dismissal powers. Removing this article ensured that elected governments could complete their constitutional tenure without arbitrary dissolution. Article 58(2)(b) had previously been invoked by various presidents to dismiss elected parliaments and cabinet governments. Constitutional reform packages frequently aim to rebalance powers between the head of state and the chief executive. The parliamentary form of government relies on cabinet accountability to the legislature rather than presidential oversight.
Political analysts view the omission of this article as a milestone in consolidating parliamentary supremacy. Constitutional lawyers study this amendment to understand the evolution of executive powers in the state. Preventing sudden assemblies dissolution fosters long-term political stability and democratic institution building. Option A refers to the general article on parliament duration rather than the specific dissolution clause. Option B incorrectly cites a subsection prefix that does not match the exact constitutional citation. Option D is wrong because the correct article provision is explicitly identified in the choices.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. As stipulated in ___________________, any summons issued for a witness to give testimony or present a document must detail the required time and venue for attendance?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. O. XVI, Rule 5, of C.P.C.
Order sixteen rule five of the civil procedure code regulates witness attendance summons. The rule mandates that every issued summons must specify the exact time and venue. Clear scheduling prevents confusion and ensures...
Q2. How is an evasive denial by a defendant treated___________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Does not have any sanctity in the eye of law
Evasive denials in judicial pleadings fail to directly address specific allegations made by the opposing side. Because the defendant avoids a clear answer, the law treats the ambiguous statement as an admission. Such eva...
Q3. The testimony of an accomplice lacks admissibility in_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Hudood cases
The uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice lacks admissibility or sufficiency in strict Hudood and religious penal cases. Hudood laws demand exceptionally high standards of direct witness evidence for conviction. Acco...
Q4. Every summons issued by a Court under the Cr.P.C must be in writing, prepared in duplicate, and bear the signature and seal of the?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Presiding officer of the Court
Judicial summons under criminal procedure must be in writing and prepared in duplicate copies. The presiding officer of the court must personally sign and seal each issued document. This formal requirement authenticates...
Q5. Any person arrested and property seized under section 20 or section 21 must be produced promptly before?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both A and B
Narcotics control legislation strictly mandates that arrested individuals and seized property be produced without unnecessary delay. Law enforcement officers must present the accused and evidence before the nearest polic...
Q6. Testimony offered without a sworn oath is deemed ________________ during judicial proceedings?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Not admissible
Testimony offered without a solemn oath or affirmation is legally inadmissible during formal judicial proceedings. Oaths bind witnesses morally and legally to tell the truth before the court. Procedural laws mandate that...