Audio cassette recordings presented as evidence are classified as__________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Admissible in law
Explanation
Audio cassette recordings are admissible as valid legal evidence when their authenticity is established properly. Courts accept recorded audio materials once the prosecution proves that the recordings have not been tampered with. Modern evidentiary rules accommodate electronic and audio records to help uncover the truth in trials. Evidence law governs what types of information can be presented before a court during judicial proceedings. Audio evidence requires foundation testimony to verify the voices, recording equipment, and continuous custody. Technological advancements necessitated the inclusion of non-documentary forms of evidence within legal frameworks.
In criminal prosecutions, intercepted phone calls or recorded conversations often serve as pivotal investigative leads. Legal counsel must carefully authenticate audio files to ensure they withstand rigorous cross-examination in court. Such evidence significantly strengthens cases involving extortion, bribery, and conspiracies where recordings capture crimes. Classifying audio recordings as entirely not admissible ignores modern developments in statutory evidence rules. Admissibility does not strictly depend on the case nature, but rather on proper authentication and relevance. The option stating none of these is inaccurate because audio recordings are clearly recognized as admissible.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. How is an evasive denial by a defendant treated___________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Does not have any sanctity in the eye of law
Evasive denials in judicial pleadings fail to directly address specific allegations made by the opposing side. Because the defendant avoids a clear answer, the law treats the ambiguous statement as an admission. Such eva...
Q2. The testimony of an accomplice lacks admissibility in_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Hudood cases
The uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice lacks admissibility or sufficiency in strict Hudood and religious penal cases. Hudood laws demand exceptionally high standards of direct witness evidence for conviction. Acco...
Q3. Any individual appointed to act as a Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor, or Special Public Prosecutor is recognized as such under the definition of_______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Section 492 Cr.P.C
Section 492 of the Criminal Procedure Code governs the official appointment of public prosecutors. Legal recognition of a public prosecutor depends entirely on the provisions outlined in this specific section. Courts ver...
Q4. Any person arrested and property seized under section 20 or section 21 must be produced promptly before?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both A and B
Narcotics control legislation strictly mandates that arrested individuals and seized property be produced without unnecessary delay. Law enforcement officers must present the accused and evidence before the nearest polic...
Q5. Testimony offered without a sworn oath is deemed ________________ during judicial proceedings?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Not admissible
Testimony offered without a solemn oath or affirmation is legally inadmissible during formal judicial proceedings. Oaths bind witnesses morally and legally to tell the truth before the court. Procedural laws mandate that...
Q6. Suits must be initiated by presenting a _________________ or via any other prescribed method ?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Plaint
Civil suits are formally initiated by presenting a written plaint to a competent court. The plaint serves as the foundational document containing all material facts of the civil claim. Filing a proper plaint triggers the...