Third-time or subsequent thefts punishable by hadd incur the amputation of_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. His left foot upto the anle
Explanation
Third-time or subsequent thefts punishable by hadd incur the amputation of his left foot. Islamic penal laws prescribe progressive physical punishments for repeat property offenders. Amputating the left foot for specific repeat thefts follows established jurisprudence rules. Hudood ordinances enforce traditional Islamic punishments for specific major crimes in Pakistan. Repeat offenses trigger escalating mandatory penalties designed to deter habitual criminal behavior. Medical and judicial safeguards ensure strict evidentiary standards before executing hadd punishments.
Legal scholars debate the application and historical interpretation of hudood amputation laws. Appellate courts scrutinize lower court judgments involving hadd penalties with extreme care. Human rights organizations monitor the implementation of corporal punishments under domestic statutes. Option A suggests the left hand, which is typically amputated for the initial theft offense. Option C proposes the right foot, which contradicts the specific left foot statutory rule. Option D is incorrect because a precise amputation penalty is mandated in option B.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. Criminal breach of trust is punishable with a term of imprisonment lasting ____________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Seven years as provided in section 406 P.P.C.
Section 406 of the Pakistan Penal Code prescribes imprisonment up to seven years for breach of trust. Criminal breach of trust involves dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to an offender. The severity of the...
Q2. Extortion is punishable under section 384 of the P.P.C with imprisonment of either description extending up to ____________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Three years
The correct answer applies because Section 384 prescribes a maximum prison term of three years for the offense of extortion. The legislative framework sets a proportionate penalty for unlawfully inducing fear of injury t...
Q3. Perpetrators of isqat-i-haml are liable to tazir punishments involving imprisonment of either description for________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both (a) and (b)
Perpetrators of isqat-i-haml face tazir punishments varying based on whether the act was done with or without consent. Penal provisions distinguish between consensual and non-consensual termination of pregnancy when assi...
Q4. Breaches of section 10 of the Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997 carry imprisonment penalties extending up to_______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Twenty five years not less than ten years
Section 10 of the Control of Narcotics Substances Act carries severe penalties up to 25 years. Lawmakers instituted high minimum and maximum prison terms to combat illicit drug trafficking. Trafficking large quantities o...
Q5. Petitions seeking execution of Federal Court orders under section 209(2) of the Government of India Act, 1935 must include certified copies and be filed__________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. To High Court from which the appeal to Federal Court was preferred
The correct answer applies because appellate procedural rules require executing higher court orders through the originating High Court. Petitions must be filed back in the specific High Court from which the initial appea...
Q6. For narcotics offenses under the 1997 Act lacking specified minimum fines, Special Courts determine fines based upon _____________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Quality and quantity of the narcotic drug psychotropic substance or controlled substance involved in the commission of offence
Special Courts determine narcotics fines based upon the quality and quantity of the substance involved in the offense. Drug control laws mandate that financial penalties scale proportionally with the weight and purity of...