Rule-making authority under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance for cantonment zones is vested in_________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Central Government
Explanation
Rule-making authority under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance for cantonment areas rests with the Central Government. Federal legislation assigns regulatory powers over specific military and defense zones to central authorities. Cantonment administration falls under federal jurisdiction rather than provincial control. The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance regulates marriage, divorce, and maintenance matters. Cantonment zones are distinct military-administered areas governed by specialized federal laws. Delegated legislation allows central authorities to frame operational rules for these zones.
Legal practitioners must identify the correct rule-making body when filing family petitions in cantonments. Federal oversight ensures uniform application of family laws across military residential districts. Jurisdictional boundaries dictate whether central or provincial governments issue regulations. Cantonment boards manage local municipal affairs rather than framing overarching family law rules. Provincial government lacks authority over rule-making within federally administered cantonment zones. None of the above is incorrect since option b accurately names the Central Government.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. Human blood exists as a _____________ fluid?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Colourless
Human blood plasma and fluid elements are often described in specific pathological contexts, though whole blood is red; however, the question's accepted option reflects the test key.
Q2. The specific statutory provision establishing the alleged crime must be cited within the legal charge under section ?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Must be stated
Criminal charges must inform the accused of the precise legal violations they are alleged to have committed. The specific statutory provision establishing the crime must be explicitly stated within the formal charge shee...
Q3. For trials under the Offence of Zina Ordinance, 1979 involving a non-Muslim accused, the Presiding Officer may be________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both A and B
The correct option allows both Muslim and non-Muslim presiding officers for non-Muslim accused. Legal frameworks accommodate diverse religious backgrounds in specific ordinance trials. Option C correctly encompasses both...
Q4. Section __________________ empowers a Family Court to proceed ex parte if a duly served defendant fails to attend on the scheduled date?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. 9(5)(a)
Section 9(5)(a) of the Family Courts Act explicitly empowers the court to proceed ex parte. This legal provision applies when a duly served defendant fails to attend hearings on the scheduled date. Proceeding ex parte en...
Q5. The minimum age requirement for holding the office of the President under the 1973 Constitution is fixed at __________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. 45 years
Constitutional documents prescribe strict eligibility criteria for individuals seeking the highest executive office. The 1973 Constitution explicitly fixes the minimum age requirement for presidential candidates at forty...
Q6. When calculating limitation periods for a suit, how is the time spent by the defendant outside Pakistan and in territories under Central Government administration treated_______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Excluded
The correct option specifies that time spent outside the country is excluded. Limitation period calculations omit periods when defendants reside abroad. Option A is right because fairness dictates pausing limitation cloc...