In proceedings under the Offence of Zina Ordinance, 1979 involving a Muslim accused, the Presiding Officer of the Court________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Shall be Muslim
Explanation
In proceedings under the Offence of Zina Ordinance involving a Muslim accused, the judge must be Muslim. Specialized religious ordinances often mandate specific religious qualifications for presiding judicial officers. This requirement aligns the administration of specific penal laws with Islamic jurisprudential principles. The Offence of Zina Ordinance introduced specific hudood provisions into the Pakistani legal system. Judicial appointments under specialized statutes require strict adherence to statutory eligibility rules. Courts must be properly constituted with qualified judges to ensure verdicts remain legally valid.
Legal practitioners review judicial compositions carefully to ensure courts possess proper jurisdiction over trials. Constitutional and statutory courts navigate complex intersections between modern state laws and religious jurisprudence. Ensuring correct judicial qualifications prevents successful appeals based on improper court constitution. Allowing judges from any religion contradicts the explicit statutory mandate required for Muslim accused. Choosing both options is logically impossible because the statute specifies a mandatory religious qualification. The option none of above is incorrect because the presiding officer must indeed be a Muslim.
- Subject
- Law
- Category
- Judiciary and Law
- Topic
- —
- Difficulty
- medium
Related questions
Q1. Lawsuits instituted against the Provincial Government, excluding railway-related matters, require a formal notice to be served upon_________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. Both A and B
Civil litigation against provincial governments requires strict adherence to mandatory statutory notice periods. Lawsuits excluding railway matters must be served upon both the government secretary and the district colle...
Q2. The Court must issue notice to ________________ whenever a suit involves interpreting constitutional law concerning the Federal Government?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. Attorney General
The correct option mandates involving the Attorney General in federal constitutional suits. Suits interpreting federal constitutional law require official government legal notification. Option A accurately identifies the...
Q3. Bailors are legally obligated under bailment provisions to disclose known defects in bailed chattels pursuant to section________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: C. 150, of the Contract Act
Section 150 of the Contract Act obligates bailors to disclose known faults in goods bailed. Failure to disclose dangerous defects makes the bailor liable for resulting damages to the bailee. This statutory duty ensures f...
Q4. Imperative law is defined as a rule or directive governing human conduct enacted by some SAMPLE
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: A. authority
Legal theory classifies rules into different categories based on their source and enforcement mechanisms. Imperative law consists of directives governing human conduct enacted specifically by a sovereign authority. The c...
Q5. Upon a plaintiff succeeding in a foreclosure lawsuit, the court is required to issue a_______________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Final decree
The correct option states that successful foreclosure lawsuits result in final decrees. Courts issue final decrees to formally conclude successful foreclosure proceedings. Option B is right because preliminary matters pr...
Q6. In any lawsuit raising questions of constitutional interpretation related to the Provincial Government, the Court must serve notice to___________________?
Show answer Hide answer
Answer: B. Advocate General
In lawsuits involving provincial constitutional interpretation, the court must serve notice to the Advocate General. The Advocate General represents the provincial government's legal interests in important court matters....